洞穴奇案的十四種判決

出版社:商務印書館(香港)有限公司
出版日期:2006
ISBN:9789620763601
作者:薩伯(Peter Suber)

作者简介

Lon Fuller?s Case of the Speluncean Exp/ ~rers is the greatest fictitious legal case of all
time. That is saying a lot, for it has some stiff competition. While its competitors
may outdo it in courtroom drama, character development, or investigative
suspense, none matches it in legal depth or dialectical agility It shows not what
makes some lawyer?s caseload interesting, but what makes law itself interesting. It
would not make a good movie; it is all ?talking heads.? In fact, the parts that
would make a good movie - the events within the cave - are over and done with
by the time Fuller begins his piece. Moreover, these events are not depicted with
cinematic vivacity, but described after the fact with judicial precision and bland-
ness.
Fuller?s live Supreme Court justices tranquilly but rigorously show the
complexity of the facts and the flexibility of legal reasoning. The live opinions
focus on different factual details and legal precedents, and lit them into different
background structures of legal and political principle. By these means Fuller
crystallizes important conflicts of principle and illustrates the major schools of
legal philosophy in his day. Fuller?s case has been called ?a classic in jurispru-
dence,? ? a microcosm of this century?s debates,? and a ?breathtaking intellectual
accomplishment.?*
Although only half a century separates us from the date of Fuller?s essay, the
legal landscape has changed profoundly. I have written nine new judicial opin-
ions on his case, with roughly Fuller?s own objectives in view, hoping to explore
important issues of principle and in the process to bring the depiction of legal
philosophy up to date.
While I would like to depict the major schools of legal philosophy today,
giving each its due, there are a few obstacles that subtly constrain the project.
Suber, Peter. Case of the Speluncean Explorers: Nine New Opinions.
Florence, KY, USA: Routledge, 1998. p ix.
http://site.ebrary.com/lib/cityu/Doc?id=2003075&ppg=9
Copyright ? 1998. Routledge. All rights reserved.
Preface
Introduction
1
Pt. I
Lon Fuller's Case of the Speluncean Explorers
5
Opinion of Chief Justice Truepenny
7
Opinion of Justice Foster
10
Opinion of Justice Tatting
15
Opinion of Justice Keen
20
Opinion of Justice Handy
25
Opinion of Justice Tatting
31
Postscript
32
Pt. II
Nine New Opinions
33
Opinion of Chief Justice Burnham
35
Opinion of Justice Springham
45
Opinion of Justice Tally
57
Opinion of Justice Hellen
64
Opinion of Justice Trumpet
73
Opinion of Justice Goad
79
Opinion of Justice Frank
89
Opinion of Justice Reckon
91
Opinion of Justice Bond
99
Index
108


 洞穴奇案的十四種判決下载 更多精彩书评



发布书评

 
 


精彩书评 (总计1条)

  •     此香港翻譯版本最大的好處就在于譯者大膽的總結了每一位法官的最主要觀點以作為每個章節的題目(雖然每位法官也許不止有一個理由作出判決),并根據自己的理解,加了副標題、段落題目,還highlight了重點語句。于是,翻譯版本看來更有條理,有利于理解。從法律知識的普及的角度來說,這實在是譯者的大功一件。以下提綱90%以上的內容就是翻譯版中的各章題目、副標題、及粗體字語句,我只是編上號碼罷了。然而因語言思維習慣不同,翻譯后感覺每個法官的判決沒有連貫性,不過這也更符合現實case report:忠實的記錄每個法官的判決及原因,不受其他judgement影響。這十四種法學流派的真正理解還需要看英文原文的。

精彩短评 (总计10条)

  •     个人支持有罪判决
  •     法理學經典案例
  •     但外行女心中仍有个疑问,就是撇开杀人这一事实和所有细节不说,人吃人这个情节,在人伦上难道不更摇摇欲坠?
  •     頗好讀, 但沒想像中精辟,結論顯而易見---- 大概因為我太偏激.
  •     刑法21條的緊急避險很實用啊,法不責人所不能,至于該案不公平的問題,民法領域貌似有一條『契約自由』原則,但畢竟有罪與否還是得取决于那些前提假設條件的,當然,道德幷非構成殺人罪名的依據,同理,民衆意向亦非無罪的理由
  •     2012年02月27日——2012年03月11日
  •     法理学/刑法/逻辑训练之最佳入门or精研读本推荐!
  •     极力推荐
  •     案件不算新奇了,探讨的法理学问题倒是不错
  •     引一段书友评论——如果有一天我犯了什么罪……这么讲不恰当,换个说法,如果有一天我成为某件刑事案的嫌疑人或被告人,我希望我的动机不是“试图以激烈手段为自己或他人寻求公正”,我宁愿作为一个职业罪犯被审判。如果我不幸被杀,我希望凶手是个体的人,而非公器,平等或意外地丧生于个人之手,我接
 

外国儿童文学,篆刻,百科,生物科学,科普,初中通用,育儿亲子,美容护肤PDF图书下载,。 零度图书网 

零度图书网 @ 2024