Arbitration Law in America美国的仲裁法

书籍目录

Acknowledgments page xxi Introduction1   The Core Values of Arbitration     Edward Brunet       Section 1.1 Party Autonomy： Allocating Disputing Power and Freedom to the Disputants      Section 1.2 Privatization： On Secrecy， Privacy， and Self-Governance     Section 1.3 Arbitrator Expertise： Substantive， Procedural， or Mythical     Section 1.4 Arbitrator Neutrality： Trust and the Relationship to Expertise      Section 1.5 The Adjudication Efficiency of Arbitration： Myth or Reality?     Section 1.6 Fairness： The Opportunity for a Fundamentally Fair Hearing     Section 1.7 Finality in Arbitration： A Core Value or a Default Rule     Section 1.8 The Public Dimension of Arbitration： The Limits of Privatization Policy     Section 1.9 Concluding Thoughts： Repackaging Arbitration Values through Trade-offs and the Paramount Value of Party Autonomy2   Common Legal Issues in American Arbitration Law     Richard E. Speidel       Section 2.1 The Relationship between Arbitration Values and Arbitration Law     Section 2.2 What is Arbitration?     Section 2.3 Development and Scope of American Arbitration Law     2.3（1） Arbitration Theory     2.3（2） The Stages of American Arbitration Law     2.3（2）（A） Stage One： Arbitrability     2.3（2）（B） Stage Two： The Middle Ground    2.3（2）（C） Stage Three： Confirmation and Enforcement of the Award    Section 2.4 Interstate Arbitration： Chapter 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act    2.4（1） History      2.4（2） Stage One： Arbitrability     2.4（2）（A） Basic Provisions     2.4（2）（B） Notable Omissions    （1） Federal Jurisdiction    （2） Scope and Preemptive Effect     （3） Employment Contracts      （4） Grounds to Refuse Enforcement      （5） Power of Tribunal to Decide its Own Jurisdiction      （6） Separability      （7） Public Policy Exclusions： Is the Claim Capable of Arbitration?     （8） Mandatory v. Permissive Rules     2.4（3） Stage Two： The Middle Ground     2.4（4） Stage Three： Confirmation and Enforcement of the Award     Section 2.5 International Arbitration     2.5（1） History： The New York Convention     2.5（2） Stage One： Arbitrability     2.5（2）（A） Basic Provisions     2.5（2）（B） Issues and Omissions    （1） Federal Jurisdiction and Venue     （2） Enforcing the Agreement to Arbitrate     （3） Competence and Separability    （4） Capability     （5） Stay of Pending Litigation     （6） Mandatory Rules     2.5（3） Stage Two： The Middle Ground     2.5（4） Stage Three： Recognition and Enforcement of the Award    Section 2.6 Intrastate （State） Arbitration Law     2.6（1） History    2.6（2） Stage One： Arbitrability     2.6（2）（A） Mandatory Rules     2.6（2）（B） Arbitrability     2.6（3） Stage Two： The Middle Ground    2.6（4） Stage Three： Enforcing the Award    Section 2.7 A Note in Transition 3   The Appropriate Role of State Law in the Federal Arbitration System： Choice and Preemption 4   Interstate Arbitration： Chapter 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act 5   Consumer Arbitration 6   International Commercial Arbitration： Implementing the New York Convention7   Tension Points： Where the Authors Disagree Appendices Index

作者简介

Arbitration Law in America: A Critical Assessment is a source of arguments and practical suggestions for changing the American arbitration process. The book, first published in 2006, argues that the Federal Arbitration Act badly needs major changes. The authors, who have previously written major articles on arbitration law and policy, here set out their own views and argue among themselves about the necessary reforms of arbitration. The book contains draft legislation for use in international and domestic arbitration and a detailed explanation of the precise justifications for proposed legislative changes. It also contains two proposals that might be deemed radical - to ban arbitration related to the purchase of products by consumers and to prohibit arbitration of employment disputes. Each proposal is vetted fully and critiqued by one or more of the other co-authors.

 Arbitration Law in America美国的仲裁法下载